認知心理学12. Language: 言語

Today

  • How is language organized?
  • How are sentences produced and -comprehended?
  • language
    • a collection of symbols and rules for combining symbols, which can express an infinite variety of messages (CP 244)
  • grammar
    • A set of rules for producing correct sentences in a language (CP 244)

Properties of language

  • Despite all this variation, there are some characteristics that all languages share- and the course of development of language is amazingly similar despite the variety of outcomes.
  • So, some characteristics that are similar for all languages:

Language is..

  • symbolic
    • arbitrary labels
    • The use of symbols, such as spoken or written words, to represent ideas (CP 244)
    • (except in the case of onimonipea) nothing inherent about this object that would lead me to call it x and not ‘chazwouzes’
  • generative
    • Almost limitless combination of words available to make statements
    • The capability to produce many different messages by combining symbols in different ways (CP 244)
    • you can make an almost unlimited number of statements from a relatively small number of possible sounds.
  • structured
    • Rules for expressing ideas (grammar)
    • The organization imposed on a language by its grammatical rules (CP 244)
    • there are rules by which the phonemes and sentences need to be arranged. We are able to learn these rules very quickly.

Organization of language

  • phoneme
    • unit of sound: th, a, aaa; there are about 100 phonemes across all languages, but only about 40 or so get used in a language- speakers of one language often have trouble with unfamiliar phonemes. Fa ra ra ra ra
    • only about 40 in English
    • The treth ef thes stestement shed be evedent frem thes bref demenstreten.
  • morpheme
    • The smallest unit of meaning in a language (CP 244)
    • English has around 50,000
    • Undesirables- un (not) desire (want) able (has the quality of) and s (plural) (There are 11 phonemes)

Organization of language

  • phrase/ propositions
    • groups of morphemes that convey a meaning: in the den, it’s raining
    • Formed according to rules of grammar.
  • sentence
    • organized sequences of words that express a thought or intention
    • organized by syntax
      • the rules that govern the placement of words and phrases in a sentence
      • in English, we don’t say: Why you did come here today?
      • yet we can parse a nonsense sentence such as: The sten befted down the flotway.
    • semantic
      • rules for organizing meaning (constrained by syntax)
      • The woman kissed her date.
        • Could have multiple meanings (is ambiguous), maybe she really likes middle-eastern fruit.
      • The woman kissed her anxious date.
        • meaning is clear because we know through syntax that an adjective modifies a noun and fruit can’t be anxious.

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3770752/wiki/cognitive/13/01.jpg

  • Language processing in the brain.
    • This view of the left hemisphere highlights the location of two centers for language processing in the brain:
    1. Broca’s area: involved in speech production
    2. Wernicke’s area: involved in language comprehension.

Aphasias



  • Broca’s aphasia
    • For them, speech is difficult to initiate, non-fluent, labored, and halting.
    • A language disorder attributed to damage in the frontal lobe of the brain (CP 247)
    • difficulty producing language
    • Paralysis on right side of body
    • Song repetition intact


The nature/nurture of language development

  • Nature provides:
    • 10 months- phoneme sensitivity (forming prototypes)
      • below 10 months of age can discriminate between all known phonemes.
    • ‘Perceptual magnet’
      • sounds get pulled closer to their prototypes.

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3770752/wiki/cognitive/13/02.jpg
(Werker, 1989)

What is learned

  • How to make phonemes.
  • How to combine phonemes to create words and sentences.

Schematic of language

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3770752/wiki/cognitive/13/03.jpg

Hierarchical organization of speech

  • Looking at how grammar constrains speech errors indicates hierarchical organization of speech.
  • Speech errors
    • slip of the tongue
      • A speech error (CP 250)
    • exchange error
      • An error in which two linguistic units are substituted for each other during sentence production (CP 250)
      • word exchange:
        • An error in which two words are substituted for each other during sentence production (CP 250)
        • usually occur between members of the same syntactic category. Both adjectives
        • “I’m not as think as you drunk I am.”
      • morpheme exchange:
        • An error in which two morphemes are substituted for each other during sentence production (CP 250)
        • it is the stems or suffixes that are exchanged. In this case, the stems slice and thin are interchanged with the suffixes ly and ed which remain in their original position
      • phoneme exchange:
        • initial consonants can be exchanged with other initial consonants
        • An error in which two phonemes are substituted for each other during sentence production (CP 250)
        • “lork yibrary”

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3770752/wiki/cognitive/13/04.jpg

NOAM CHOMSKY’S (1957) THEORY OF LANGUAGE

  • PHRASE STRUCTURE GRAMMAR
    • Divide these sentences into meaningful parts:
The strong youths carried the heavy boxes
  Noun phrase   Verb phrase
Adjective Noun Verb Noun phrase
The doctor consoled the grieving parent.
Noun phrase Verb phrase
The cottage across the lake was purchased
  Noun phrase Verb phrase
Noun phrase Adjective phrase verb phrase

Phrase Structure Grammar alone is insufficient.

  • “The dog is chasing the cat.”
    • phrase structure simply tells us how we can partition this sentence into smaller grammatical units.
  • Which sentence is most like the KERNEL sentence(核文)?
    • “The cat is chasing the dog.”
      • Similar in PHRASE STRUCTURE
    • “The cat is being chased by the dog.”
      • Similar in MEANING

Another issue with phrase structure grammar

  • Flying planes can be dangerous
    • Surface structure mapped onto two meanings
    1. flying planes are dangerous to the pilot.
    2. the planes themselves are dangerous.
  • The problem is that the sentence can only be partitioned in one way; thus, the ambiguity cannot be resolved using different phrase structure rules.

NOAM CHOMSKY’S (1957) THEORY OF LANGUAGE

  • transformational grammar:
    • an alternative to the phrase structure grammar because it describes both the grammatical structure an how sentences can be transformed.
    • A set of rules for transforming a sentence into a closely related sentence (CP 252)
    • “The dog is chasing the cat.”
  • Transform the KERNEL into PASSIVE TENSE:
    • “The cat is being chased by the dog.”
  • Transform the KERNEL into a NEGATION:
    • “The dog is not chasing the cat.”
  • Transform the KERNEL into a QUESTION:
    • “Is the dog chasing the cat?”
  • Transform the KERNEL into a ALL THREE:
    • “Isn’t the cat being chased by the dog?”
  • Transformational grammar alone is insufficient.
    • “Puffy clouds relax the couch.”
  • Transform the Kernel into PASSIVE TENSE:
    • “The couch is relaxed by puffy clouds.”
  • Transform the Kernel into a NEGATION:
    • “Puffy clouds do not relax the couch.”
  • Transform the Kernel into a QUESTION:
    • “Do puffy clouds relax the couch?”
  • ''PROBLEM'': Although transformational grammar provides the rules for transforming sentences into various meanings, it does not guarantee that a sentence will be meaningful.
    • Chomsky tried to rectify this problem by placing constraints on which words could be used and substituted in a sentence.
    • In this example, the verb relax requires an animate object.
      • Clouds and couch’s don’t relax.

NOAM CHOMSKY’S (1957) THEORY OF LANGUAGE

  • To help understand these problems with transformational grammar, Chomsky included two levels.

1. surface structure:

2. deep structure:

    • the meaning of a sentence
    • The underlying meaning of a sentence (CP 254)
    • Allows the extraction of the kernel from various transformations

EVIDENCE FOR TRANSFORMATIONAL GRAMMAR: ''Chase & Clark (1972)''

  • Processing negative transformations
    • STAR IS TO RIGHT OF PLUS. +- (KERNEL SENTENCE)
  • Negative transformation:
    • STAR IS NOT LEFT OF PLUS. +- (TRANSFORMATION)
  • To evaluate this sentence, we first mentally transform it to its kernel sentence:
    • ''STAR IS TO RIGHT OF PLUS. +- (KERNEL SENTENCE)''
  • This transformation takes time to process.

Semantic influence on syntactic parsing

  • Animate vs. inanimate nouns
    • The defendant examined by the lawyer turned out to be unreliable.
      • Eye-tracking data show that people slow down when they reach “by the lawyer” in the first sentence.
      • The reason is that Ss expect the verb examined to be the main verb which should then be followed by a noun phrase.
    • The evidence examined by the lawyer turned out to be unreliable.
      • Ss do not experience this slow down because there assumption that examined is the main verb is correct.
  • In other words, the context (whether the sentence begins with and animate or inanimate noun) influences the ease of later comprehension.

Semantic Context and Word Recognition

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3770752/wiki/cognitive/13/05.jpg

  • When we read something semantic context can facilitate recognition of later words
    • Ex: we’ve all encountered handwriting that is difficult read, an we can often use previous words to identify an illegible word.
    • We don’t have any trouble reading and comprehending either of these two sentences even though the two sentences contain a physically identical word.
    • The context in both sentences allows us to correctly guess which word comes next and thus we interpret it correctly.
  • high-constraint sentence:
    • Produce an expectation for a given word.
    • A sentence that produces a high expectation for a particular word (CP 257)
    • John kept his gym clothes in a locker
    • John kept his gym clothes in a closet
  • In H.C. sentences reaction times are slower when the word is not expected.
  • low-constraint sentence:
    • Produce an expectation for a broader range of words.
    • A sentence that produces an expectation for a broader range of words (258)
    • The lady was a competent chef
    • The lady was a competent cook
  • In L.C. sentences both the expected and unexpected word have equally fast reaction times.

Contextual factors

  • Although he was continually bothered by the cold…
  • When we read this partial sentence, the word cold is somewhat ambiguous without any prior context.
  • Thus, it is unclear whether cold refers to the temperature or whether it refers to the subjects health.

Processing ambiguous words: ''Swinney & Hakes, 1976''

  • Swinney tested whether a clarifying context made an ambiguous sentence easier to comprehend.
  • ambiguous sentence
    • A sentence that has more than one meaning (CP 252)
  • 2 tasks simultaneously while listening to pairs of sentences.
    • Task 1- rate how related 2 sentences are
      • requires comprehension
    • Task 2- push a button when a particular phoneme is heard.
      • slower response when they are having trouble comprehending the sentence
  • IV: type of text (ambiguous or contextualized)
  • DV: RTs for button press
  • Target phoneme: /k/ (in corner)
  • (1) Rumor had it that, for years, the government building had been plagued with problems. The man was not surprised when he found several ''bugs/ insects'' in the __c__orner of his room. (ambiguous)
  • Findings: RT for bugs > RT for insects
    • In the control condition bugs was replaced with insect and responses were significantly faster when word insect.
  • (2) Rumor had it that, for years, the government building had been plagued with problems. The man was not surprised when he found several spiders, roaches, and other ''bugs'' in the __c__orner of his room. (contextualized)
    • In this version the preceding context sets up the word bugs for the correct interpretation.
    • 1 interpretation: correct context activates only a single meaning of the word
  • Findings: RT for +1 > RT for +2

What happens to alternative interpretations of words?

  • BUG- insect related meaning/ spy-related meaning
  • Swinney, 1979
    • Swinney did another experiment to test whether ambiguous words activated multiple meanings of the word or only one meaning.
    • Same study except phoneme detection task became lexical decisions.
  • lexical decision task
    • A task that requires people to decide whether a string of letters is a word (CP 257)
  • Ss heard this sentence:
  • Rumor had it that, for years, the government building had been plagued with problems. The man was not surprised when he found several bugs -in the corner-- of his room.
    • The asterisks represent when the lexical decision task occurred. Immediately after bugs or after a delay of four syllables.
  • Test words:
    • Appropriate interpretation: ANT
    • Inappropriate interpretation: SPY
    • Unrelated: SEW
  • However, it is those four syllables that disambiguate the word bugs.
  • Results
    • IV: timing of lexical decision task
    • DV: RT for lexical decision
    • At -: ANT = SPY < SEW
    • At --: ANT < SPY = SEW
  • What we see is that when the task occurs immediately after the word, bugs both ant and spy are faster than the non-related word.
  • But there is no difference in reaction times between ant and spy.
  • However, when the task occurred after the delay responding to ant was significantly faster than responding to either spy or sew.
  • →both meanings of an ambiguous word are activated momentarily, and the context allows the Ss to select the correct meaning quickly.
  • Activating both meanings in ambiguous words is an advantage.
    • If only one, the most frequent, meaning was activated, it would takes a great deal of time longer to have go back and activate and select the alternative meaning when we ran into a sentence requiring the alternative.

Individual differences

  • Factors influencing ambiguity resolution
    • Reading skill
      • Poor readers are unable to suppress the inappropriate meanings of ambiguous words.
    • working memory capacity
      • The amount of information that can be kept active in working memory (CP 261)
  • Since Ken really liked the boxer, he took a bus to the nearest…
    • Boxer: the dominant meaning is that of a fighter, while the less dominate meaning is that of a dog.
  • Readers with small capacities had trouble resolving the ambiguous word if it turned out to refer to a dog (the less dominate meaning).
    • Good readers have larger working memory capacities, thus keeping both meanings active in working memory is easy.
    • However, poor readers have smaller capacities and are therefore only able to maintain the dominant meaning for any length of time.

error recovery heuristic

  • A strategy for correcting comprehension errors (CP 261)
  • Used for correcting comprehension errors
    1. Reinterpret the inconsistent word
    2. Check previous words that might have lead to the difficulty
    3. Read on for further information
    4. Elaborate on the inconsistency to make it consistent

Read out loud the sentence that will appear below

''CINDERELLA WAS SAD BECAUSE SHE COULDN’T GO TO THE DANCE THAT NIGHT. THERE WERE BIG TEARS IN HER BROWN DRESS. ''(CARPENTER & DANEMAN, 1981: Error recovery heuristics)

  • Read out loud the sentence that will appear on the next slide

''THE YOUNG MAN TURNED HIS BACK ON THE ROCK CONCERT STAGE AND LOOKED ACROSS THE RESORT LAKE. TOMORROW WAS THE ANNUAL FISHING CONTEST AND FISHERMEN WOULD INVADE THE PLACE. SOME OF THE BEST BASS GUITARISTS IN THE COUNTRY WOULD COME TO THE SPOT. THE USUAL ROUTINE OF THE FISHING RESORT WOULD BE DISRUPTED BY THE FESTIVITIES.'' (CARPENTER & DANEMAN, 1981)

Beyond the words: inferences

  • The angry swarm of bees flew out of the hive and landed on Joan's hand. Her hand was soon very sore and she regretted having bothered the insects.
  • In this case we are able to use language to imply something without explicitly asserting it.

''Bransford, Barclay & Franks, 1972''

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3770752/wiki/cognitive/13/06.jpg

  • Studied the effects of inferences on memory.
  • Three turtles rested on a floating log, and a fish swam beneath them.
  • Specifically they studied how subjects would falsely recognize implied statements.
  • Recognition sentence:
    • Three turtles rested on a floating log, and a fish swam beneath them.
  • Comparison condition:
    • Three turtles rested beside a floating log, and a fish swam beneath it.
  • Recognition sentence:
    • Three turtles rested beside a floating log, and a fish swam beneath them.
  • Comparison condition:
    • Three turtles rested beside a floating log, and a fish swam beneath it.
  • Here they do not make a false recognition because the comparison sentence is not implied by the recognition